Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
CBAB 19(4) 2019
Editions
CBAB 19(3) 2019
Uncategorized
CBAB 19(2) 2019
CBAB 19(1) 2019
CBAB 18(4) 2018
CBAB 18(3) 2018
CBAB 18(2) 2018
CBAB 18(1) 2018
CBAB 17(4) 2017
CBAB 17(3) 2017
CBAB 17(2) 2017
CBAB 17(1) 2017
CBAB 16(4) 2016
CBAB 16(3) 2016
CBAB 16(2) 2016
CBAB 16(1) 2016
CBAB 15(4) 2015
CBAB 15(3) 2015
CBAB 15(2) 2015
CBAB 15(1) 2015
CBAB 14(4) 2014
CBAB 14(3) 2014
CBAB 14(2) 2014
CBAB 14(1) 2014
CBAB 13(4) 2013
CBAB 13(3) 2013
CBAB 13(2) 2013
CBAB 13(1) 2013
CBAB 12(S2) 2012 Special Edition
CBAB 12(4) 2012
CBAB 12(3) 2012
CBAB 12(2) 2012
CBAB 12(1) 2012
CBAB 11(S1) 2011 Special Edition
CBAB 11(4) 2011
CBAB 11(3) 2011
CBAB 11(2) 2011
CBAB 11(1) 2011
CBAB 10(4) 2010
CBAB 10(3) 2010
CBAB 10(2) 2010
CBAB 10(1) 2010
CBAB 09(4) 2009
CBAB 09(3) 2009
CBAB 09(2) 2009
CBAB 09(1) 2009
CBAB 08(4) 2008
CBAB 08(3) 2008
CBAB 08(2) 2008
CBAB 08(1) 2008
CBAB 07(4) 2007
CBAB 07(3) 2007
CBAB 07(2) 2007
CBAB 07(1) 2007
CBAB 06(4) 2006
CBAB 06(3) 2006
CBAB 06(2) 2006
CBAB 06(1) 2006
CBAB 05(4) 2005
CBAB 05(3) 2005
CBAB 05(2) 2005
CBAB 05(1) 2005
CBAB 04(4) 2004
CBAB 04(3) 2004
CBAB 04(1) 2004
CBAB 03(4) 2003
CBAB 03(3) 2003
CBAB 03(2) 2003
CBAB 03(1) 2003
CBAB 02(4) 2002
CBAB 02(3) 2002
CBAB 02(2) 2002
CBAB 02(1) 2002
CBAB 01 (4) 2001
CBAB 01 (3) 2001
CBAB 01 (2) 2001
CBAB 01 (1) 2001
CBAB News
+55 31 3612-4490
cbabjournal@gmail.com
Close

Matheus Henrique Silveira Mendes, Magno Antônio Patto Ramalho

Abstract: The aim of this study was to estimate the repeatability of some phenotypic stability parameters: reliability index (I), regression coefficient (b0 and b1), ecovalence, and the mean of the absolute scores (MAS), and to check the implications of estimating stability parameters using a reduced number of environments. A dataset comprising 25 common bean lines assessed in 36 environments was used. These environments comprise different locations, sowing seasons, and years. Different experimental groups, from three to 18 environments, were simulated. For each group, analysis of variance was performed and the stability parameters were estimated. The greater repeatability estimates were observed for the mean (b0), followed by the I and b1. Ecovalence and MAS had the lowest values for the repeatability estimates, which is not desirable for breeding programs aiming at selection for high stability. The phenotypic stability parameter should not be estimated from fewer than 12 environments.

Get the article here. (PDF)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *