Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
CBAB 20(4) 2020
CBAB 20(3) 2020
Editions
Uncategorized
CBAB 20(2) 2020
CBAB 20(1) 2020
CBAB 19(4) 2019
CBAB 19(3) 2019
CBAB 19(2) 2019
CBAB 19(1) 2019
CBAB 18(4) 2018
CBAB 18(3) 2018
CBAB 18(2) 2018
CBAB 18(1) 2018
CBAB News
CBAB 17(4) 2017
CBAB 17(3) 2017
CBAB 17(2) 2017
CBAB 17(1) 2017
CBAB 16(4) 2016
CBAB 16(3) 2016
CBAB 16(2) 2016
CBAB 16(1) 2016
CBAB 15(4) 2015
CBAB 15(3) 2015
CBAB 15(2) 2015
CBAB 15(1) 2015
CBAB 14(4) 2014
CBAB 14(3) 2014
CBAB 14(2) 2014
CBAB 14(1) 2014
CBAB 13(4) 2013
CBAB 13(3) 2013
CBAB 13(2) 2013
CBAB 13(1) 2013
CBAB 12(S2) 2012 Special Edition
CBAB 12(4) 2012
CBAB 12(3) 2012
CBAB 12(2) 2012
CBAB 12(1) 2012
CBAB 11(S1) 2011 Special Edition
CBAB 11(4) 2011
CBAB 11(3) 2011
CBAB 11(2) 2011
CBAB 11(1) 2011
CBAB 10(4) 2010
CBAB 10(3) 2010
CBAB 10(2) 2010
CBAB 10(1) 2010
CBAB 09(4) 2009
CBAB 09(3) 2009
CBAB 09(2) 2009
CBAB 09(1) 2009
CBAB 08(4) 2008
CBAB 08(3) 2008
CBAB 08(2) 2008
CBAB 08(1) 2008
CBAB 07(4) 2007
CBAB 07(3) 2007
CBAB 07(2) 2007
CBAB 07(1) 2007
CBAB 06(4) 2006
CBAB 06(3) 2006
CBAB 06(2) 2006
CBAB 06(1) 2006
CBAB 05(4) 2005
CBAB 05(3) 2005
CBAB 05(2) 2005
CBAB 05(1) 2005
CBAB 04(4) 2004
CBAB 04(3) 2004
CBAB 04(1) 2004
CBAB 03(4) 2003
CBAB 03(3) 2003
CBAB 03(2) 2003
CBAB 03(1) 2003
CBAB 02(4) 2002
CBAB 02(3) 2002
CBAB 02(2) 2002
CBAB 02(1) 2002
CBAB 01 (4) 2001
CBAB 01 (3) 2001
CBAB 01 (2) 2001
CBAB 01 (1) 2001
+55 31 3612-4490
cbabjournal@gmail.com
Close

Viviane de Oliveira Souza, Margarete Magalhães Souza, Gonçalo Santos Silva, Cláusio Antônio Ferreira de Melo, Jôsie Cloviane de Oliveira Freitas and Analu Cruz Souza

ARTICLE – Morphological and cytogenetic characterization of new ornamental Passiflora hybrids (P. ‘Vivis’ and P. ‘Jhovi’)

Abstract: The present study was performed for the morphological and cytogenetic description of F1 hybrids obtained from a cross between Passiflora coccinea Aubl. and Passiflora hatschbachii Cervi. Hybridization was confirmed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Corona banding was the most relevant floral descriptor for separating the hybrids into two groups, the cultivars P. ‘Vivis’ and P. ‘Jhovi’, and the parents and hybrids had diploid chromosome number 2n=18. The F1 progenies exhibited normal meiotic behavior with normal tetrad production, which guaranteed high pollen viability (>70%) and fertile hybrids. Therefore, P. ‘Vivis’ and P. ‘Jhovi’ have the potential to be used for ornamental
plants market

Get the article here. (PDF)